PSJD News Digest – February 14, 2025

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Hi Interested Public,

The news continues to pile up with increasing bite. Last night was hard. I don’t know what this evening and this weekend will have in store, but hopefully we’ll have a chance to unpack it together next week. For the time being, here are the stories worth sharing. Our overall framework for understanding this moment has grown a bit from last week. In particular, I’ve introduced a section on “Academic Funding Restrictions” which may surprise some of you. I hope the pull quote I’ve provided will illustrate why it seems worthwhile to pay careful attention to dramatic changes in the funding ecosystem for university staff on the STEM side of things as well.

Stay strong and stay in touch,

Sam

Editor’s Choice(s)

  • EXCLUSIVE: Judicial Branch Swept Up In Trump-Musk Lease Termination Spree (Talking Points Memo; 12 Feb 2025)

    “Elements of the judicial branch, including public defender offices, have been caught up in the Trump administration’s headlong rush to terminate thousands of leases of government office space, TPM has learned. Unlike the vast majority of federal workers whose office leases are under review for termination, public defenders are not executive branch employees. They work for the judicial branch…Some federal public defenders’ offices received a notice last week from the General Services Administration titled “Right-sizing the Federal Inventory.” The notice, obtained by TPM, was issued by acting GSA Administrator Stephen Ehikian and asked recipients to indicate whether terminating the lease on a given office will leave their mission “irreparably compromised,” and whether the location “directly serves the public.””

OMB Spending “Pause”

Conflicts Over Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility

Academic Funding Reductions

  • What National Institutes of Health funding cuts could mean for U.S. universities (NPR; 12 Feb 2025)

    “[Q:] What kind of financial trade offs would administrators have to consider under this policy?

    [A:] There are a lot of numbers floating around from different institutions as to how much they would be cut. But a lot of the larger ones would have to find $150 [million] or even $200 million every year to replace the money that they're getting from the federal government. The choices that they have are all pretty bleak. They'd have to cut other programs in order to fill that hole in, which could affect any discipline or any function of the university. Or they would have to cut corners in the way they administer the research, which could create all kinds of problems with accounting or noncompliance with the government's regulations.” [emphasis added]

Changes at the Department of Education

  • Musk Staff Propose Bigger Role for A.I. in Education Department (New York Times; 13 Feb 2025)

    “A new chatbot would answer questions from student borrowers…But transitioning into using generative A.I. for student aid help, as a replacement for some or all human call center workers, is likely to raise questions around privacy, accuracy and equal access to devices, according to technology experts.”

2025 Federal Reductions in Force

“Performance Management” (NEW)

  • Sweeping cuts hit recent federal hires as Trump administration slashes workforce (NPR; 13 Feb 2025)

    “According to an Energy Department official, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) had suggested the agency use a template that cited "performance reasons" as the cause of the firings. The official said the Energy Department letter had removed that phrasing because many of the employees had performed well during their probationary period. The Energy Department's press office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.”

Hiring Freeze

  • Trump Hiring Freeze Has Agencies Ditching Law School Recruiting (Bloomberg Law; 7 Feb 2025)

    “For some of these students, the fact that these jobs were pulled may make the difference of whether they ever become a practicing attorney or not,” said Nikia Gray, NALP’s executive director. “This is happening at a really critical juncture in their career development.”

Probationary Employee “Purge”

Administrative Leave for Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Accessibility, and Environmental Justice Employees [among others]

Deferred Resignation (“Fork in the Road”)

Other Topics

Comments off

PSJD News Digest – February 7, 2025

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Hi Everyone,

The news continues to pile up. I’ve pulled back from as-it-happens updates on NALP Connect to try and provide more of a week-end synthesis. Let me know how that works for you. The Public Service Section had a useful “huddle” last Monday where we sketched out a helpful framework for understanding the dramatic changes burning across the federal administrative state. Since we talked that framework through (on Monday), I need to add an additional prong to the “2025 Federal Reductions in Force” list, based on a new OPM memo regarding “performance management data” (see below). (For background on each of these categories, please consult the last two editions of the Digest.)

Stay strong and stay in touch.

Solidarity,

Sam

Editor’s Choice(s)

  • Donald Trump to Sell Off Half of All Federal Property: What to Know (Newsweek; 5 Feb 2025)

    “The General Services Administration (GSA) reportedly sent out notice on Tuesday that it plans to sell half of the federal property it manages—a move that appears to contradict Donald Trump's and Elon Musk's plans to get federal employees to return to in-person work in the office.”

  • Can Trump Dismantle the Department of Education? Here’s What to Know (Time; 6 Feb 2025)

    “President Donald Trump is reportedly finalizing an Executive Order that would attempt to dismantle the Department of Education, which would fulfill a campaign promise as he seeks to shrink the size of the federal government. As Trump tests the limits of his presidential authority, experts say the abolishment of the agency would be difficult, though not impossible. ”

OMB Spending “Pause”

2025 Federal Reductions in Force

“Performance Management” (NEW)

  • Request for Agency Performance Management Data (OPM Memo; 6 Feb 2024)

    “Pursuant to the President’s direction…OPM is developing new performance metrics for evaluating the federal workforce…no later than Friday, March 7, 2025, all agencies should submit data regarding their performance management plans and policies—including those contained in collective bargaining agreements—and identify any barriers to ensuring that 1) agency performance plans make meaningful distinctions based on relative employee performance and 2) the agency has the ability to swiftly terminate poor performing employees who cannot or will not improve.”

Hiring Freeze

Probationary Employee “Purge”

Reclassification of Career Employees

Administrative Leave for Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Accessibility, and Environmental Justice Employees

  • All the ways Elon Musk is breaking the law, explained by a law professor (Vox; 6 Feb 2025)

    “[Q:] One thing that really has struck me about the new administration’s tactics so far is this extremely aggressive use of paid administrative leave. Career officials who’ve resisted DOGE’s demands have been quickly put on administrative leave. So were government officials working on DEI. Nearly all of the staff of USAID, the US Agency for International Development, has met that fate. [A:] This is very strange and likely illegal. Federal law limits administrative leave to 10 workdays per year. So they will be exhausting the cap very quickly for many of these people. Normal administrations use it the way normal businesses use it, as a patch for a variety of problems….This is making strategic use of it on a vastly grander scale and there’s simply no legal authority for that.”

Deferred Resignation (“Fork in the Road”)

Comments off

PSJD News Digest – January 31, 2025

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Hi Everyone,

This has been another week where decades happen. Apologies for omitting state-and-local stories; if I have a moment next week I’ll try and do a roundup for you. But this edition of the Digest is focused exclusively on unpacking the sweeping changes the nascent Trump administration is effecting across the federal workforce through executive orders and agency memoranda. I’ve grouped these efforts into broad categories for you which should give you a sense of the week’s major stories. (Additionally, I’ve circled back to two of the items I highlighted briefly in the introduction to last week’s Digest before I shifted my focus to the federal hiring freeze.)

Stay strong and stay in touch.

Solidarity,

Sam

OMB Spending “Pause”

On January 27th, OMB circulated an internal memo (available through the Washington Post) to the heads of all Executive Departments and Agencies, requiring that "each agency must complete a comprehensive analysis of all of their Federal financial assistance programs [… and i]n the interim, to the extent permissible under applicable law, Federal agencies must temporarily pause all activities related to obligation or disbursement of all Federal financial assistance, and other relevant agency activities that may be implicated by executive orders, including, but not limited to, financial assistance for foreign aid, nongovernmental organizations, DEI, woke gender ideology, and the green new deal."*

As we're all aware, both governmental organizations at the state-and-local level and also civil society organizations include federal financing in their budgets, either directly or indirectly. This new policy from OMB may have a significant impact on finances across the public service legal space-which may in turn affect those organizations' ability to recruit and retain their staff. As a result, I’ve been monitoring the developing fate of this “pause” quite closely this week.

Here’s what’s happened to-date:

“Fork in the Road” Deferred Resignation Plan

Strategies for Terminating Federal Workers

  • Probationary “Purge”

    • Guidance on Probationary Periods, Administrative Leave and Details (OPM Memo; 20 Jan 25)

      “Probationary periods are an essential tool for agencies to assess employee performance and manage staffing levels. Employees on probationary periods can be terminated during that period without triggering appeal rights to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). …No later than January 24, 2025, agencies should identify all employees on probationary periods, who have served less than a year in a competitive service appointment, or who have served less than two years in an excepted service appointment, and send a report to OPM listing all such employees[.]”

    • Probationary Federal Employees Targeted for Mass Purge (The American Prospect; 29 Jan 25)

      “Below is the copy of an email received by employees of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which was sent to people who “have been identified as an employee likely on a probationary/trial period.” It has been reported that agencies were asked to assemble lists of these newly hired employees. …”As a probationary/trial period employee, the agency has a right to immediately terminate you pursuant to 5 CFR § 315.804,” the email reads. It claims that the termination would occur immediately upon the employee receiving notice. The American Federation of Government Employees, which represents unionized EPA officials, sent an email to staffers, urging them to “Please do what you need to protect all of your information regarding your Federal employment … you need to download/print out all pertinent employment information such as your entire eOPF. Do this ASAP!””

  • Reclassification

    • Guidance on Implementing President Trump’s Executive Order titled, “Restoring Accountability To Policy-Influencing Positions Within the Federal Workforce” (OPM Memo; 27 Jan 25)

    • Trump administration targets wide range of positions for removing federal job protections (Fed News Network; 27 Jan 25)

      “In a memo published Monday morning, Office of Personnel Management Acting Director Charles Ezell detailed how agencies should move forward with implementing President Donald Trump’s executive order on “restoring accountability to policy-influencing positions within the federal workforce,” while also announcing the suspension of portions of the Biden administration’s regulations aiming to prevent a return of the Trump administration’s previous Schedule F policy. …Trump administration officials have stated that the purpose of reclassifying career federal employees in policy-related roles is a way to give agencies more flexibility, and to be able to remove employees who are not carrying out the president’s agenda. The number of federal employees the new guidance could impact is uncertain. Some have said tens of thousands of feds could be reclassified, while other estimates put the number of impacted employees in the hundreds of thousands. Based on the language of the new memo, the Trump administration’s interpretation of “policy-influencing” positions appears to be relatively far-reaching, according to a source familiar with OPM policy and regulations who agreed to speak to Federal News Network on background. The source said the categories identified in the memo can be construed quite broadly — especially considering the memo’s encouragement for agencies to expand the interpretation further. Because of that, it’s likely the ultimate number of reclassified positions would reach the higher end of previous estimates. In an effort to prevent efforts similar to Schedule F from returning in a future administration, the Biden administration previously finalized regulations in April 2024 to reinforce civil service protections for career federal employees…The new memo from the Trump administration, however, described parts of the April 2024 final rule as “procedural obstacles,” and changed the interpretation of the rule to say “policy-influencing” roles do cover career federal employees. OPM’s memo pointed to certain portions of the final regulations that were issued under the authority of the president, saying that Trump’s executive order “immediately superseded” those portions of the final regulations.

      The Trump administration’s guidance said the Merit Systems Protection Board cannot hear appeals of career federal employees who are reclassified, due to the same interpretations of the regulations. The memo also rescinded the Biden administration’s OPM guidance on its final rule reinforcing civil service protections. “Despite this declaration, federal employees who are affected by reclassification should consult with a federal employment attorney on their legal rights,” the Alden Law Group, a federal employment law firm, wrote in a blog post Monday.”

    • CREW, Democracy Forward sue to block Trump’s illegal plan to fire government workers (CREW Press Release; 28 Jan 25)

      “President Trump’s executive order paving the way to convert potentially tens of thousands of merit-based civil servants to at-will employees, enabling political appointees to fire and replace them with loyalists, is unlawful and exceeds the president’s authority, according to a lawsuit filed today in Maryland federal court by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). PEER is represented in the suit by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) and Democracy Forward.”

Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Accessibility, and Environmental Justice

  • “Initial Guidance Regarding President Trump’s Executive Order Defending Women” (OPM Memo; 29 Jan 25) [2 pages long]

    “In light of Defending Women, each agency should take prompt actions to end all agency programs that use taxpayer money to promote or reflect gender ideology as defined in Section 2(f) of Defending Women. Specifically, agency heads should take the following steps…[n]o later than 5:00pm EST on Friday, January 31 2025:… Review all agency position descriptions and send a notification to all employees whose position description involves inculcating or promoting gender ideology that they are being placed on paid administrative leave effective immediately as the agency takes steps to close/end all initiatives, offices, and programs that inculcate or promote gender ideology.”

Comments off

PSJD News Digest – January 25, 2025

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Hello, interested public!

The biggest public service news this week concerns sweeping actions taken by the new Presidential administration via Executive Order. A number of executive actions have profound implications for hiring and recruitment news, including an order “Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing” (w/accompanying OPM Guidance) and OPM guidance directing agencies to “identify all employees on probationary periods, who have served less than a year in a competitive service appointment, or who have served less than two years in an excepted service appointment[] and send a report to OPM listing all such employees,” and noting that “[e]mployees on probationary periods can be terminated during that period without triggering appeal rights to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB).

Having called your attention to these two already, I want to focus on the policy that seems to have created the most immediate concern and uncertainty for our community: the new federal “hiring freeze”. To help you think through this issue I have curated the following resources and breaking news into a narrative for you. You’ll find some news on other topics of concern this week further down in the Digest.

Solidarity,

Sam

Editorial Focus: The 2025 Federal “Hiring Freeze”

Authority (Written, Public):

On 20 Jan, Pres. Trump issued a Presidential Action titled “Hiring Freeze”. In this action, he ordered “a freeze on the hiring of Federal civilian employees[; …] no Federal civilian position that is vacant at noon on January 20, 2025, may be filled, and no new position may be created except as otherwise provided for in this memorandum or other applicable law.” [emphasis added] In a 20 Jan memo providing guidance on this order, the acting directors of OMB and OPM clarified that the freeze encompasses “all types of Federal civilian appointments, regardless of the length of the appointment.” [emphasis added]

Historical Context: The 2017 Hiring Freeze – Similarities and Key Differences

These documents appear to broadly mirror similar action taken by the first Trump administration in January 2017.1 (Government Executive discussed the long-term impacts of that policy on 20 Jan.) Importantly, as in 2017 the current “freeze” also includes guidance directing agencies to revoke employment offers to hires that do not have a scheduled start prior to a specific deadline (in 2025, the relevant cutoff is 8 Feb).

However, two things seem notably different this time: (1) 2025 OPM/OMB guidance was issued the same day as the Presidential Action and (2) the 2025 Guidance includes clearer lines of communication for agency staff with further questions.2 While in 2017 we saw a slight thawing of the hiring freeze after a week of confusion (between the Presidential announcement and the agency guidance), these differences suggest that agencies implementing this hiring freeze in its initial days already have the information they need. Without confusion, evidence is emerging that they are acting more broadly than they did under the first Trump administration under similar (written, public) directions.

Happening Now

Initial (Anonymous) Reports of Rescinded Paid Internship Offers Suggest Broad Application of OMB/OPM Guidance 

Anonymously in social media posts on 22 Jan and 23 Jan, some people shared that their pathways internships have been revoked as a result of this freeze. These reports, if credible, suggest that some agencies are interpreting this order very broadly. (According to OMB/OPM’s 20 Jan guidance, “[a]ppointments made prior to January 20, 2025, under the Pathways Internship…program [are permitted an exemption to the Federal civilian hiring freeze].”) 

Additional (Unattributed) Reports of Rescinded Unpaid Internship Offers Suggest Freeze Action Broader than Directed 

I’ve also heard some reports on background that agencies are shuttering their unpaid internship programs. Unpaid interns are not typically understood as either “federal employees” (under federal statute)3 or “federal appointees” (under OPM policy).4 It seems that some agencies are freezing hiring for volunteer placements that do not appear directly implicated by the written policies that instigated the freeze.

Potential Next Steps

I’ve heard from some people that applicants and recent hires have been attempting to contact agencies for more information. It’s worth noting that Government Executive reported on 22 Jan that “[OPM and OMB said] any correspondence with prospective applicants must cease” (it’s difficult to say whether these instructions include applicants at all stages of the hiring process or prospective hires; I wasn’t able to find a publicly available source for this language).

Under the circumstances, applicants and prospective hires for federal positions may want to consider reaching out to their congressional representative with a constituent service request asking for help getting clarity about their specific circumstances. The Congressional Research Service’s coverage of constituent services suggests that while no congressmember is obligated to mediate with federal agencies to help constituents answer questions (see CRS IF10503), “[c]ommon requests for [constituent services] casework involve…obtaining a missing record…from a government agency” (CRS R44726). Further, CRS provides congressmembers with sample language suggesting they inform constituents that “[a]lthough we cannot force an agency to expedite your case or act in your favor, we can frequently intervene to facilitate the processes involved, encourage an agency to give your case consideration, and sometimes advocate for a favorable outcome” (CRS RL33209) (I wouldn’t suggest that “a favorable outcome” here could be that a position would be reinstated, but an agency might be urged to discuss an individual’s case in greater detail, apply to OPM for an exemption from the hiring freeze policy, or reconsider its latitude under existing rules.)

Other News

Student Loans & Student Debt

Non-Profit & Government Management & Hiring

Access to Justice – Civil & Economic

Access to Justice – Criminal

Comments off

PSJD News Digest – January 17, 2025

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Hello, interested public! Apologies for returning a week later than I’d anticipated. It’s good to be back. So much is happening right now–or anticipated. It’s been difficult to cull the news down to a digestible size for you all, but I’ve done my best below. Beyond the Editor’s Choices, I’ll note that US DOJ employees (in two divisions) just voted to unionize for the first time in history, that many state supreme court chief justices addressed access to justice or indigent defense issues in their annual remarks, and that remarks made by Russell Vought, President Trump’s nominee for OMB Chief, are getting a lot of attention. As always, these stories and more are in the links below.

Take care,

Sam

Editor’s Choice(s)

Student Loans & Student Debt

Non-Profit & Government Management & Hiring

Access to Justice – Civil & Economic

Access to Justice – Criminal

Comments off

PSJD News Digest – December 13, 2024

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Hello, interested public! It’s another weighty digest this week as relevant news continues to pile up thick and fast as we barrel toward the New Year. I’ll do my best to help everyone keep up with the pace. Many stories that would have merited an “Editor’s Choice” in a slower week are collected in their respective sections; this is one worth reviewing carefully.

Take care,

Sam

Editor’s Choice(s)

Student Loans & Student Debt

Non-Profit & Government Management & Hiring

Pro Bono

Access to Justice – Civil & Economic

Access to Justice – Criminal

Comments off

PSJD News Digest – December 6, 2024

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Hello, interested public! It’s a doorstop of a digest this week as we catch up with two weeks of news (no digest last Friday on account of US Thanksgiving). Lots of major stories this week, including a large number of articles discussing anticipated or announced changes to federal work policies under the incoming administration and further discussion of the rapidly changing legal circumstances of non-profit organizations. As always, these stories and more are in the links below.

If you’re interested in the issues we cover in this Digest, consider attending NALP’s Public Service Conference, which will be held virtually via Zoom next week (!!) on December 10th & 11th. Hope to see you there!

Take care,

Sam

Editor’s Choice

Student Loans & Student Debt

Non-Profit & Government Management & Hiring

Access to Justice – Civil & Economic

Access to Justice – Criminal

Comments off

PSJD News Digest – November 22, 2024

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Hello, interested public! The major story this week concerns H.R. 9495, which passed the US House of Representatives after major opposition from many nonprofits. Additional stories involve analyses of potential changes to student debt relief and federal hiring. As always, these stories and more are in the links below.

If you’re interested in the issues we cover in this Digest, consider attending NALP’s Public Service Conference, which will be held virtually via Zoom on December 10th & 11th. Hope to see you there!

Take care,

Sam

Editor’s Choice

Student Loans & Student Debt

Non-Profit & Government Management & Hiring

Access to Justice – Civil & Economic

Access to Justice – Criminal

Comments off

PSJD News Digest – November 15, 2024

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Hello, interested public! The major story this week concerns a failed US Congressional vote on a bill that would have dramatically impacted nonprofits’ operations. In other news, New York City legal groups say that the city government has delayed contractual payments to a degree that threatens their operations, and the Chief Justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court addressed her state’s lawyer shortage in recent remarks. As always, these stories and more are in the links below.

If you’re interested in the issues we cover in this Digest, consider attending NALP’s Public Service Conference, which will be held virtually via Zoom on December 10th & 11th. Hope to see you there!

Take care,

Sam

Editor’s Choice

Student Loans & Student Debt

Non-Profit & Government Management & Hiring

Access to Justice – Civil & Economic

Access to Justice – Criminal

Comments off

PSJD News Digest – November 8, 2024

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Hello, interested public! Lots of news this week; I’ve done my best to pull a few threads for you related to our shared corner of the world. I hope you and yours are doing alright in yours.

Take care,

Sam

Student Loans & Student Debt

Non-Profit & Government Management & Hiring

Access to Justice – Civil & Economic

Access to Justice – Criminal

Comments off