Archive for July, 2025

PSJD News Digest – July 29, 2025

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Hi Interested Public,

Thanks for your patience with me. After some delays, last week’s news is available today. Agencies across the federal government continue to explore their newfound freedom of motion after the Supreme Court lifted injunctions below preventing them from implementing various reductions in force to effectuate Executive Orders issued over the last several months. The Department of Education (which is itself being dramatically reduced) stated publicly that student loan payments made under the new structure created by Congress’ recent reconciliation bill will be eligible for Public Service Loan Forgiveness, although it has paused income-based repayment plans for the interim while it works on a new policy for handling loans. Some–but not all–legal services organizations in New York City have settled their differences with management, while the strike action in Boston continues and additional federal defenders move to withhold labor as the service is unable to pay them. In Florida, state and local governments are experimenting with their own DOGE-style reforms.

As always, these stories and more are in the links below. Solidarity,

Sam

Editor’s Choice(s)

Federal RIFs & Grant Cancellations

Non-Federal Government

Civil Society

  • Republicans Probe Bloomberg-Backed NYU Climate Program Funding Officials in State Attorney General Offices (The Washington Free Beacon; 17 Jul 2025)

    “The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee is investigating…the New York University School of Law's State Energy & Environmental Impact Center…On Thursday, Oversight Committee chairman James Comer (R., Ky.) sent letters to Bethany Davis Noll, the impact center’s executive director, and Patricia Harris, the CEO of Bloomberg Philanthropies. Comer raised ethics concerns about the fellowship, which he said "undermines faith" in the American legal system, and demanded the two leaders provide relevant documents and communications.”

  • Big Law Firms Bowed to Trump. A Corps of ‘Little Guys’ Jumped in to Fight Him (NYTimes; 21 Jul 2025)

    “I don’t know if the administration knew how many little guys are out there,” said Michael H. Ansell, a solo practitioner in Morristown, N.J., who earlier this year joined the Pro Bono Litigation Corps, newly launched by Lawyers for Good Government, a legal nonprofit. He answered the nonprofit’s plea for lawyers willing to give at least 20 hours a week to an upcoming case. More than 80 volunteered.”

  • In a packed Boston courtroom, Harvard takes on Trump (KCRW; 21 Jul 2025)

  • Takeaways From the Chronicle and AP’s Report on Cuts to Government Grants (Chronicle of Philanthropy; 22 Jul 2025)

    “Since the 1960s, presidential administrations from both parties have used taxpayer dollars to fund nonprofits to take on social problems and deliver services. A vast and interconnected set of federal grants fund public safety programs, early childhood education, food assistance and refugee resettlement services in every state…An analysis by the Urban Institute provides a sense of the scale and reach of government support for nonprofits.”

  • A Quiet War Is Targeting America’s Nonprofits—Most Don’t See It Coming (Forbes; 24 Jul 2025)

    “With government dollars now used as leverage, the institutions that have long held civil society together are being quietly dismantled. This piece breaks down the damage, exposes the political intent, and lays out five ways the sector can fight back before it’s too late.”

Non-Federal Funding

Student Debt & Other Student Concerns

  • Changes to federal student loans leave aspiring medical students scrambling to cover costs (Chicago Tribune; 23 Jul 2025)

    “But Turner cautioned against the abrupt reversal of the program. After accounting for inflation, the lifetime borrowing limits now placed on graduate students are lower than they were in 2005, she said. Many students may turn to private loans to cover the gap, often at higher interest rates…Sophia Tully, co-president of the Minority Association of Pre-Med Students at Northwestern, said she and her peers have struggled to reconcile with a system that often feels stacked against them. The 21-year-old plans on taking an extra gap year before medical school in an effort to save money.”

Conflicts Over Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility

Access to Justice

Comments off

PSJD News Digest – July 18, 2025

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Hi Interested Public,

Following closely on its order of July 8th lifting lower court injunctions against an array of “reduction in force” plans across the federal bureaucracy, the Supreme Court lifted a lower court injunction preventing the Department of Education from acting on an Executive Order issued last March aimed at “Closing the Department of Education”. The implications of this latest order for student debt and federal employment generally are profound even in a period characterized by seismic shocks. (See “Editor’s Choices”)

In other news, the US Congress (having passed budget reconciliation) is looking forward to FY26; the House of Representative’s approach does not completely defund LSC but does include “dramatic staffing cuts” (per Government Executive). Public defenders in NYC are striking in increasing numbers, the defender strike in Boston is continuing to reveal structural issues, and federal defenders are working without pay after the US courts exhausted their budget; defenders in North Dakota have already stopped work.

As always, these stories and more are in the links below. Solidarity,

Sam

Editor’s Choice(s)

  • The Supreme Court just handed Trump his biggest victory of his second term. And they didn’t even bother to explain themselves (Vox; 14 Jul 2025)

    “The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the Trump administration may fire more than half of the Department of Education’s workforce — mass terminations that, in Education Secretary Linda McMahon’s words, are “the first step on the road to a total shutdown” of the entire department.

    …Last week, in Trump v. American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), the Supreme Court issued a similar decision reinstating a different Trump executive order which called for mass firings. That order required federal agency leaders to come up with aggressive plans to fire agency employees, but did not provide many details on who will be fired.

    …Sotomayor [] would have waited for the agencies to release their plans, and then she would have determined whether any of these plans make such deep cuts that they amount to something like an unconstitutional impoundment.

    …The McMahon case, by contrast, presented the same issue that Sotomayor anticipated in her AFGE concurrence. Secretary McMahon has already come up with a plan to fire more than half her department’s employees, and that plan was before the Supreme Court. So Sotomayor and her colleagues could determine whether any of these cuts are so deep that they effectively eliminate federal programs mandated by Congress.

    Now that this issue was properly before the Court, however, Sotomayor’s Republican colleagues appear to have come out in favor of impoundment.”

    • How Trump plans to dismantle the Education Department after Supreme Court ruling (Washington Post; 15 Jul 2025)

      “McMahon is expected to move quickly — department lawyers have already previewed the plans in court filings…Among the most important decisions is where to put management of federal student loans, a $1.6 trillion portfolio affecting nearly 43 million borrowers…a June court filing indicated the Treasury Department is expected to take over the work.”

    • Former Chief Federal Lawyers Sound the Alarm: Federal Employees Need Your Help (The Contrarian; 18 Jul 2025)

      “As former General Counsels and Solicitors of federal departments and agencies, we write to ask all lawyers previously employed by the federal government to come to the aid of their former coworkers…The actions of the current administration have led to massive job losses in the federal sector and extraordinary confusion and anxiety among federal employees. These employees need counsel to understand their rights and how best to cope with a very challenging situation. All lawyers formerly employed by the federal government (who maintain an active license in any state) can help provide such counsel.”

Federal RIFs & Grant Cancellations

Non-Federal Government

Civil Society

Non-Federal Funding

Student Debt & Other Student Concerns

Conflicts Over Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility

Access to Justice

Comments off

PSJD News Digest – July 11, 2025

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Hi Interested Public,

Apologies for a doorstop of a digest this week, covering this week and the one prior to the July 4 holiday. Let me explain. No, it’s too much. Let me sum up.

In Washington DC, the federal judiciary cleared the way for the Trump Administration to proceed with portions of its agenda hugely significant to public interest law: the Supreme Court cleared the way for the Trump Administration’s effort to radically reduce and restructure the federal civil service (the State Department seems to be the first agency in line) and D.D.C. determined that the DOJ’s decision to terminate grants to immigration legal service providers is not subject to judicial review. In Congress, the President’s budget reconciliation bill passed, including significant changes to the Department of Education’s student loan programs. In the Executive Branch, the Department of Education completed a multi-day negotiated rulemaking process without reaching consensus with the civil society representatives it had invited and the Trump administration extended its hiring freeze through this October. Meanwhile, elsewhere in the United States, governments are adapting: New York City, Los Angeles, and Massachusetts expanded funding for immigrant legal services and Arizona funded civil legal aid within its state budget for the first time in history. Also at the city level, labor actions; Boston’s public defender strike drags on and NYC public interest lawyers look increasingly ready to start one of their own.

As always, these stories and more are in the links below. Solidarity,

Sam

Editor’s Choice(s)

  • Federal Hiring Office Walks Back Essay Questions for New Hires (Bloomberg Law; 3 Jul 2025)

    “The Office of Personnel Management sought to soften the importance of essay prompts for federal job applicants after critics warned the test would screen applicants based on how they’d help President Donald Trump’s agenda…OPM notified federal agency heads last week in a written notice that the essay questions outlined in a May 29 memo “must not be used as a means of determining whether the candidate fulfills the qualifications of a position.”…The notice represents a rare reversal on the Trump administration’s push to root out those disloyal to Trump and to cut tens of thousands of jobs from the federal workforce. The new memo was made public by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, a worker advocacy group that filed a complaint with the US Office of Special Counsel alleging that the new essay questions amounted to a loyalty test for nonpartisan civil servants.”

Federal RIFs & Grant Cancellations

  • Federal workforce likely to shrink further under extended hiring freeze (Federal News Network; 8 Jul 2025)

  • Lutnick’s Commerce Department Innovating New Ways to Keep Potential Employees Away (Splinter; 7 Jul 2025)

    “The memo, viewed by Splinter, changes the official policy surrounding probationary employees, flipping the script on how the end of a probationary period will generally go. If you were a potential employee, well, you might not be now. “If not terminated sooner, the appointment of an employee serving a probationary or trial period terminates [emphasis theirs throughout] before the end of the tour of duty on the last day of his/her probationary or trial period,” the memo states, “unless the appropriate DOC management official certifies that finalizing his/her appointment advances the public interest.“

  • Sources Say Zeldin’s EPA Is Retaliating Against Declaration Signers (Splinter; 3 Jul 2025)

    “According to multiple sources inside the Environmental Protection Agency, an “upset” Administrator Lee Zeldin has begun retaliating against agency staff who signed a Declaration of Dissent opposing his destructive tenure. This is pretty obviously illegal.”

  • DOJ Can Halt Legal Aid Services for Immigrants, Judge Rules (Bloomberg Law; 7 Jul 2025)

    “The Justice Department convinced a federal district judge to dismiss a lawsuit that challenged President Donald Trump‘s pause on funding for legal orientation service provider contracts to aid immigrants. DOJ’s decision to terminate immigrant assistance programs isn’t subject to judicial review, said Judge Randolph D. Moss of the US District Court for the District of Columbia on Sunday, granting in part the agency’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing the remainder of the suit from a dozen subcontractor groups.”

Non-Federal Government

Civil Society

Non-Federal Funding

Student Debt & Other Student Concerns

  • Final Day of Neg Reg Concludes Without Consensus on Proposed PSLF Rules (NASFAA; 2 Jul 2025)

    “The Department of Education (ED) began its final day of negotiated rulemaking (Neg Reg) with hopes of reaching a consensus on its proposed rules on changes to the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program. ED sent out updated proposed language Tuesday evening, and even provided a newer updated version just minutes into the session's start, but ultimately, consensus eluded the committee…Negotiators Abby Shafroth of the Student Loan Borrower Assistance Project and Betsy Mayotte of The Institute of Student Loan Advisors argued that while the higher standard was an improvement, it failed to address the core issue: the proposal grants the Secretary the power to adjudicate violations of complex laws (such as immigration or medical regulations) that fall far outside ED’s expertise.”

    • Trump May Weaponize Student Loans Against Public Servants (New York Magazine; 9 Jul 2025)

      “Following a muddled consultation process with a panel of experts, the Department of Education is on its way to implementing that new policy, which would target people involved in whatever Secretary of Education Linda McMahon deems to be “illegal activities,” like assisting undocumented immigrants, supporting transgender people, and so-called terrorism (supporting Palestinians). But as the Associated Press points out, the possible wrongdoing is so open-ended that the policy could be used as a tool of retribution against a wide range of people and organizations:”

  • U.S. Treasury’s Next Target: Student Loan Debt (Tampa Free Press; 3 Jul 2025)

    “With the ink barely dry on monumental trade deals and the 2017 tax cuts now permanently extended, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced a pivotal new focus for his department: the nation’s sprawling student loan debt…He was quick to differentiate the upcoming Treasury approach from previous efforts, explicitly rejecting former President Joe Biden’s debt forgiveness strategies. “I do think that just forgiving student debt was unacceptable,” he asserted. Instead, Bessent promised a more nuanced and impactful solution. “I think that there is a firm and humane way to deal with the student debt crisis. And we are going to be focused on that here at Treasury,” he continued. The Secretary highlighted the significant burden student loans place on young Americans, noting that many graduate “post-college with the equivalent of a mortgage.””

Conflicts Over Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility

Access to Justice

Comments off

PSJD News Digest – July 1, 2025

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Hi Interested Public,

Thanks for your patience. (Last) week was quite eventful–even by the standards of 2025. The news below will bring you up to speed through last weekend–with a couple of exceptions where the information I had collected last week had already been superceded. Major news out of the Supreme Court last week; commentators moved swiftly to unpack what a ruling concerning the availability of “universal” injunctions as a remedy may mean for other Trump Administration policies currently enjoined by federal courts–including policies pertaining to federal reductions in force. Meanwhile, a draft purporting to be a plan to limit the availability of Public Service Loan Forgiveness to workers at certain employers leaked from the Department of Education.

High drama continues in the US Congress, as the Senate debates a budget bill which contemplates major changes to student loans and potentially federal benefits (student loan changes for current borrowers and changes to the structure of federal benefits were taken out by the Senate parliamentarian, when last I checked). At the state level, the Governor of Maryland implemented a hiring freeze, the Maine Commission on Public Defense Services warned it may run out of money, and the Oregon legislature approved a budget plan that included compensation incentives for public defenders to exceed state-imposed caseload limits (and provisions for slashing pay for defenders who don’t carry sufficient caseloads). In civil society, nonprofits work to adapt to ongoing changes to their funding environment, while the Department of Justice announced an investigation into the hiring practices of the University of California.

The Digest will be off on July 4th, and will return with stories from this week and next week on 7/11.

As always, these stories and more are in the links below. Solidarity,

Sam

Editor’s Choice(s)

  • Mass layoffs likely to remain blocked, for now, thanks to a Supreme Court footnote (Government Executive; 27 Jun 2025)

    “The Supreme Court on Friday limited individual judges’ capacity to strike down government policy on a nationwide basis, a decision with potentially far-reaching impacts on how federal agencies carry out their work. The high court left in place some carve outs, however, including one that could—at least temporarily—protect a judge’s ruling that is currently blocking the Trump administration from carrying out widespread layoffs…In a footnote of the opinion, however, Barrett added that nothing in the decision “resolves the distinct question whether the Administrative Procedure Act authorizes federal courts to vacate federal agency action.” District court judges in both the larger RIF injunction and one more specifically tailored to the Education Department relied in part on the APA to support their findings.”

  • Education Department Outlines Plan to Change Debt-Relief Program for Public Servants (Inside Higher Ed; 26 Jun 2025)

    “The Education Department is planning to put new limits on which employers can qualify for the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program, according to a draft proposal obtained by an advocacy group. Any employers who engage in what the department calls “activities that have a substantial illegal purpose” could be kicked out of the program, and any payments that borrowers make while working for them won’t count after their employers are no longer eligible, according to the draft document.” [draft proposal here]

  • Trump administration eyes cuts to student-loan forgiveness for public servants (MarketWatch; 28 Jun 2025)

    “In draft regulatory text circulated this week by the U.S. Education Department, the agency proposed stripping eligibility for Public Service Loan Forgiveness from organizations engaging in activities that have “a substantial illegal purpose.” Representatives from certain interest groups, including consumer advocates, borrowers and servicers, will debate the plan and its implications for the future of PSLF next week.”

Federal RIFs & Grant Cancellations

Civil Society

Non-Federal Funding

Student Debt & Other Student Concerns

Conflicts Over Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility

Access to Justice

Comments off