Archive for Public Interest Law News Bulletin

PSJD Public Interest News Digest – August 21, 2020

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Interested public. Much news again this week, a pattern that seems unlikely to slacken anytime soon. Dozens of nonprofits weighed in on the debate about diploma privilege, while the Bexar County DA sought guidance on whether he could hold the USPS liable for violating election law. The House Education and Labor Committee heard testimony about the potential effects of the most recent executive order concerning student debt, and some excellent reporting from the Davis Vanguard, a California paper, described efforts in Missouri and Virginia to remove prosecutorial discretion from reform-minded prosecutors–in the former case by replacing their judgment with that of the state Attorney General, and in the latter with the judgment of the court.

Take care of one another,

Sam

Editor’s Choice(s)

COVID-19 and Remote Legal Practice

Racial Justice

Rule of Law & Voting Rights

Pro Bono Publico

Legal Technology

Non-Profit & Gov’t Management & Hiring

Student Loans & Student Debt

Immigration, Refugee, & Citizenship Issues

Access to Justice – Civil & Economic

Access to Justice – Criminal & Decarceration

Criminal Justice Reform

Comments off

PSJD Public Interest News Digest – August 14, 2020

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Interested public. Another behemoth digest this week. Major stories include new research from the Center for American Progress & the American Bar Association and a new executive order extending the moratorium on student debt collections.

Take care of one another,

Sam

Editor’s Choice(s)

“professional diversity on the federal appellate courts is severely lacking, with significant implications for the type of legal expertise underlying the opinions these judges issue. Only about 1 percent of sitting circuit court judges have spent the majority of their careers as public defenders or within a legal aid setting. In contrast, the federal appellate bench is swamped with those who spent the majority of their careers in private practice or as federal prosecutors—making up more than 70 percent of all sitting appellate judges. No sitting judge spent the majority of their career with a nonprofit civil rights organization…This lack of diversity not only reflects the closed and elitist nature of the federal appellate bench but also represents a barrier to the courts’ ability to develop intellectually rich jurisprudence grounded in an awareness of a broad set of individuals’ experiences across the country. To improve this state of affairs, significant disruptions are needed—from law school through every stage of an attorney’s prejudicial career—to broaden pathways to the federal bench and challenge long-held assumptions on the “right” type of attorney to take up a gavel.(emphasis added)

COVID-19 and Remote Legal Practice

Rule of Law & Voting Rights

Legal Technology

Non-Profit & Gov’t Management & Hiring

Student Loans & Student Debt

Immigration, Refugee, & Citizenship Issues

Access to Justice – Civil & Economic

Access to Justice – Criminal & Decarceration

Criminal Justice Reform

Comments off

PSJD Public Interest News Digest – August 7, 2020

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Interested public. Another behemoth digest this week. Major stories include the growing chorus of concern about a coming wave of evictions, weighty deliberations at the ABA (see Editor’s Choices).

Take care of one another,

Sam

Editor’s Choice(s)

COVID-19 and Remote Legal Practice

Rule of Law

Legal Technology

Non-Profit & Gov’t Management & Hiring

Immigration, Refugee, & Citizenship Issues

Student Loans & Student Debt

Access to Justice – Civil & Economic

Access to Justice – Criminal & Decarceration

Criminal Justice Reform

Comments off

PSJD Public Interest News Digest – July 31, 2020

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Interested public. No time for a summary this week; apologies. Major stories are summarized below. Hope this message finds you well.

Take care of one another,

Sam

Editor’s Choice(s)

COVID-19, Remote Legal Practice, & Decarceration

Rule of Law

Legal Technology

Non-Profit & Gov’t Management & Hiring

Immigration, Refugee, & Citizenship Issues

Student Loans & Student Debt

Access to Justice – Civil & Economic

Access to Justice – Criminal & Decarceration

Criminal Justice Reform

Comments off

PSJD Public Interest News Digest – July 17, 2020

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Interested public. The news continues to lie thickly around us, particularly in the areas of justice reform and the debate around how to responsibly reopen physical courts. There’s a lot of material this week so I’ll keep my summary brief. I do want, however, to call attention to yesterday’s edition of PSJD’s Jobs’o’th’Week. We’ve heard that people want more job highlights from PSJD so my colleague Brittany Swett has expanded her weekly feature to include additional positions that have stood out as she manages our job database on an ongoing basis.

Take care of one another,

Sam

Editor’s Choice(s)

COVID-19, Remote Legal Practice, & Decarceration

Rule of Law & Voting Rights

Legal Technology

Non-Profit & Gov’t Management & Hiring

Immigration, Refugee, & Citizenship Issues

Student Loans & Student Debt

Access to Justice – Civil & Economic

Criminal Justice Reform

Comments off

PSJD Public Interest News Digest – July 10, 2020

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Interested public. Interesting times continue to lay news on thickly–especially concerning criminal justice reform. Other blockbuster stories this week include new rules from the Trump Administration regarding the status of foreign students attending US universities (and universities’ response), mounting calls from the law class of 2020 for states to make changes to their licensure policies, and a new policy document from the Biden campaign reflecting a Biden/Sanders compromise position on student debt.

Take care of one another,

Sams

Editor’s Choice(s)

COVID-19 & Remote Legal Practice

Rule of Law

Legal Technology

Non-Profit & Gov’t Management & Hiring

Immigration, Refugee, & Citizenship Issues

Student Loans & Student Debt

Access to Justice – Civil & Economic

Access to Justice: Criminal

Criminal Justice Reform

Comments off

PSJD Public Interest News Digest – July 2, 2020

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Interested public. The digest is back this week with another bursting edition; thanks for bearing with me. Chicago Law published a new study on human rights violations in use-of-force regulations for police departments in cities across the United States, while law students in NY, NJ, and CT took action to voice their perspective on racial justice issues within their campuses. The US Supreme Court made the Director of the CFPB easier for the President to remove, while the House Oversight and Reform Committee took up the question of whether the Executive Branch lied to Congress about the legality of its proposal to eliminate the OMB and merge its remainder into the GSA. Attorneys have begun grappling with the beginnings of an eviction crisis as state moratoria on evictions come to a close, the ACLU in both Arizona and Michigan took steps to make prosecutors more accountable for misconduct, and attorneys in Las Vegas began their defense of Legal Observers arrested during recent protests.

As usual, you can find these stories and many others below.

Take care of one another,

Sam

Editor’s Choices:

COVID-19 & Remote Legal Practice

Immigration, Refugee, & Citizenship Issues

Non-Profit & Gov’t Management & Hiring

Student Loans & Student Debt

Access to Justice – Civil

Access to Justice – Criminal

Decarceration

Criminal Justice Reform

Comments off

PSJD Public Interest News Digest – June 19, 2020

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Interested public. Hope today goes well for you, wherever you are. Big stories this week include two decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court: the 1964 civil rights act protects gay, lesbian, and transgender employees from discrimination based on sex, and the Trump Administration’s attempt to eliminate the DACA program was improper under the Administrative Procedures Act. (Although the Court also declined cert. on many cases before it concerning the doctrine of qualified immunity.) Meanwhile, more district attorneys across the United States announced they will not prosecute protesters arrested in recent weeks. In New York NY, police responded by refusing to work with the DAs offices that issued such statements. Meanwhile, in other news, Washington State has discontinued its Limited License Legal Technicians program and Congress is once again criticizing Secretary DeVos’ handling of student loans.

These stories and more are in the links below.

Take care of one another,

Sam

Editor’s Choice

Public Defense

Immigration, Refugee, & Citizenship

Legal Practice & COVID-19

Non-Profit & Gov’t Managment & Hiring

Student Loans & Student Debt

Legal Technology

Access to Justice – Civil

Access to Justice – Criminal

Criminal Justice Reform

Comments off

PSJD Public Interest News Digest – June 12, 2020

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Interested public. Major stories this week follow on the heels of last week’s events–many of which are ongoing. In particular, Public Defenders across the United States marched for racial justice this week. In the world of legal technology, the public learned more about the technological tools law enforcement has brought to bear against protesters while several major tech companies made commitments to refrain from selling specific technologies to law enforcement. Journalists continued their efforts to catalog the various efforts for pro bono assistance springing up in communities across the United States.

These stories and more are in the links below.

Take care of one another,

Sam

Editor’s Choice: Systemic Racism & the Unauthorized Practice of Law

Secret Police

Protest Responses

Defenders

Pro Bono Representation

Class Actions

Prosecutors

Legal Technology

Immigration, Refugee, and Citizenship

Student Loans

COVID-19 & Decarceration

Access to Justice – Civil

Access to Justice – Criminal

Criminal Justice Reform

Comments off

PSJD Public Interest News Digest – June 5, 2020

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Interested public. I compile this digest each week (well, most weeks) to bring you public interest law news. This week, the news is that public protests and the forces of the law are in perilous tension. After Minneapolis law enforcement slowly murdered a Black man in their custody in broad daylight and in full view of multiple witnesses and cameras, people across the United States have been moved to protest against systemic racial oppression. Law enforcement officers have responded with brutal violence while many mayors demonstrated bipartisan disinterest in police accountability. The President of the United States has placed the District of Columbia under military occupation and threatened sovereign U.S. states with similar treatment rather than consider meaningful reforms. Retired and serving members of military leadership have begun to remind soldiers of their Constitutional oaths while the U.S. Attorney General deploys heavily-armed, unmarked forces in downtown DC.

The legal community, in response, has begun bringing lawsuits. Lawyers across the country have committed to serving protestors pro bono. The Supreme Court of the United States weighed whether to revisit the doctrine of “qualified immunity” for law enforcement. The Supreme Court of Washington issued a challenge to the legal community:

As lawyers and members of the bar, we must recognize the harms that are caused when meritorious claims go unaddressed due to systemic inequities or the lack of financial, personal, or systemic support. And we must also recognize that this is not how a justice system must operate. Too often in the legal profession, we feel bound by tradition and the way things have “always” been. We must remember that even the most venerable precedent must be struck down when it is incorrect and harmful. The systemic oppression of black Americans is not merely incorrect and harmful; it is shameful and deadly.

Finally, as the New York Attorney General says “she’s prepared to legally challenge President Donald Trump’s threat to send in the military”, at least one legal commentator (Elie Mystal of the Nation) questioned the relevance of a legal response to a military encounter:
If the military is told to occupy New York City or Los Angeles, they’ll go. If they’re told to secure the streets, in violation of the constitutional right to peaceable assembly, they’ll do it. If they’re told to round up and arrest protesters, or members of the press, they’ll do it. They won’t even have to open fire on a crowd of unarmed civilians—the threat that one of them might is more than enough to vitiate any pretense of constitutional democracy…People have to think [] about how to stop a man who is above the law, using all the peaceful tools (always the peaceful tools) available to us.

These stories are in the links below.

Take care of one another,

Sam

The President of the United States is not a dictator, and President Trump does not and will not dominate New York state. In fact, the president does not have the right to unilaterally deploy U.S. military across American states[.] We respect and will guard the right to peaceful protest, and my office will review any federal action with an eye toward protecting our state’s rights. Rest assured: We will not hesitate to go to court to protect our constitutional rights during this time and well into the future.

Comments off